background image
FEMTOcELLS
08
UMA ToDAY
SPRING 2008
Unlike current macro 3G Radio Access Networks, where
operators integrate 10s to 100s of high-capacity base
stations (Node Bs) over private networks to Radio Network
Controllers (RNCs), femtocell access networks require
operators to integrate hundreds of thousands of low-
capacity base stations that can be moved/added/changed
by users at any time, all connected over the unsecured
and untrusted public internet. In order for the femtocell
market to reach its full potential, it is critical for the
industry to quickly address the unique requirements for
femtocell integration.
Currently, operators and technology service providers are
considering various approaches for femtocell device-to-core
network connectivity. UMA is seen by many as rising rapidly
to the top of the list, and a number of mobile operators are
now seeking to leverage the existing 3GPP UMA standard to
address this unique challenge that femtocells present.
FeMToceLL To core neTWork con-
necTiviTY oPTionS
Over the last few years,
mobile infrastructure providers have proposed a number
of device-to-core network connectivity solutions. These
fall into three general approaches: "Iu-b"-based solutions,
"SIP/IMS"-based solutions and "Iu-over-IP"-based solu-
tions (Figure 1).
When comparing these three alternatives, the key
operator requirements for femtocell device-to-core
network connectivity include:
1. Full-Service Transparency ­ The approach must
enable the operator to provide all existing and
planned services to handsets when connected
via the femtocell, whether those services are
currently circuit-based or packet-based.
2. Low Deployment Cost and Network Disruption
­ The approach must enable the operator to

Figure 1: Femtocell Device-to-Core Network Connectivity Approaches